Challenge 5
Both the presentation and the proposal table are attached. Thank you for looking!
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| dattebayo_challenge5.pdf | 887.35 KB |
| proposal_table.pdf | 55.03 KB |
i see
Thank you for your comments. I agree that we had too much text on the pages along with other comments. The green was my mistakes because I did it on an old CRT monitor and it looked fine on there, but I guess for other monitors the green background appears to be really distractive to the eyes. I don't want to make excuses but our team members all had projects due this week so we didn't have enough time to refine on information. I really appreciate your commentary and suggestions Bennett.
- Login to post comments
Very slick presentation
Very slick presentation guys. Who did the design of the tree? Seriously, you should make shirts for Threadless. I would buy all of them. Very comprehensive analysis, a good read.
---
Je représente la France dans la Ligue des Notions
- Login to post comments
Energizing title page
I loved your title page but agree that some of the other pages were a little hard to read.
- Login to post comments
Very informative!
Good research. You did a great job summarizing the pros and cons of each possible choice. There was too much information on some of the slides for comfortable viewing, though. I was really surprised you did not choose to use any wind energy, especially when it is considerably cheaper than tidal. More information about what you didn't choose would have been interesting.
- Login to post comments
Thank you for your comments
I really appreciate your comments to help us learn and grow. It's nice to see judges and everyone else taking time to give feedbacks. Like what I told Bennett, we were really busy last week so we had less time to refine our information. That was why some of the pages had too much text among other short-comings of our work.
- Login to post comments
Good layout, but...
Dattebayo, once again you take the cake for really clean page layout. But I found your presentation a bit hard to read for a couple of reasons. First, the deep green background on some of the pages reduced the contrast & affected readability of the text. Speaking of which... there was a LOT of text. So much of the text looked like quotes (quotation marks etc.), & even though you included sources at the end, it was impossible to tell where each factoid came from without citation. Once again, I would have given your presentation at least 5 additional points for quality if you had had an English major go over it carefully. And it seems that your ultimate power capacity was less than specified in the challenge criteria...?