Our Energy Future
Well-researched, well-organized
Good submission, Global Voice, & I didn't think that your uploading problems affected your quality. You obviously spent considerable time researching & organizing your work & it shows. Your sources are cited appropriately throughout. The PowerPoint (text + images) is simple but informative. I wondered a bit why you had chosen to double the capacity effect of lifestyle changes for the period from 2015 to 2025...? It's obvious from the numbers that lifestyle changes give a lot of bang for the buck but wouldn't it be hard to double this in 10 years? A bit more explanation of how this would be implemented would have been appreciated.
- Login to post comments
A clean job in power point.
A clean job in power point. Some solid research. :)
---
Je représente la France dans la Ligue des Notions
- Login to post comments
Good effort
Sorry to hear about your technical difficulties. The powerpoint looks good.
- Login to post comments
Attractive presentation
You made some good choices, and did some good research. Your slides were relevant, easy to read and gave a concise and clear summary of important issues. Tidal energy and wave energy are still fairly new technologies, especially in BC, but you are correct in saying that the costs will come down as the technology improves. I'm not sure but I don't think geothermal energy on Vancouver Island is likely to be developed very soon, if at all. I have some concern about the reliability of your choices, since the wind is not always strong enough and tidal energy is predictable but not always at its peak. More information about why you didn't choose run of river or the other choices would be interesting.
- Login to post comments




Difficulties with our Submission!
Unfortunately, our challenge 5 didn't submit properly. As you can see, we have our PowerPoint presentation and our graphs but our summary for our graphs is missing. Therefore, I'll just post our summary here so everyone can have a better understanding for our tables!
The above figures are based on figures provided by Royal Academy of Engineering in England and the Government of British Columbia. It also takes into consideration the relative reduction in capital (equipment) costs as technologies improve and become more widespread by 2025. The reason for choosing and allocating such amounts of electricity production are based primarily on cost, sustainability and reliability of each source. Given Vancouver Islands geographical location, we felt that both wind and wave can play a vital role in the production of electricity. Both of these sources are fairly cheap in regards to the raw material itself, the primary cost in both cases would be the capital cost incurred in setting up the respective equipment for both types. Geothermal energy can also be tapped into in the mountainous region of Vancouver Island. Furthermore, the conservation of energy and simply using it more efficiently can also play a role in making more electricity available for the Island. Both wind and tidal energy are renewable sources for producing energy. Furthermore, neither of these sources produces any type of air or water pollution. Both resources allow for the production of electricity without contributing to global warming as they don’t produce any wastes or greenhouse gasses. We also feel with the improvement in technology for alternative sources of energy and consuming energy will also play a drastic role in these methods becoming more widespread in various parts of the province where such resources are available.